« Is this the media future? | Main | Journalist ought to love social media »

April 09, 2008


Great piece Kristine,

The short answer is that of course journalists should blog.

Yes there is a problem about the blurring of fact and opinion but let's be honest haven't we got that anyway in the media.

Journalists are inherantly good writers with a flair for words.
Why shouldn't we blog if we've got something interesting to say?
As long as it doesn't conflict with our reporting I think it's a good thing. There's a pleasure to be had in reading a well written blog.


Don't know. You tell me...


Of course, as I've been in the blogging game for quite a while myself, I'm quite partial to the idea of journalists blogging - as I touch on in the first link. But I do think that journalists have a few additional obstacles to overcome. I'll try to return to this in the morning.

Nigel: yes, I do seem to remember having one or two debates about editorialising in the pre-blogging days too:-)

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo


Comment Policy

  • Comments are welcome, but due to the curse of spam I've had to turn on pre-moderation both for comments and trackbacks. However, all comments & trackbacks on topic will be accepted, apologies for any delays. For the sake of people's ability to listen in to the conversation I prefer comments in English, but also accept Norwegian, Danish, Swedish and German.

Become a Fan