O'Reilly has a change of heart – latest on bloggers code of conduct
April 14, 2007
Tim O'Reilly, the Web 2.0 guru who almost created a firestorm of his own when he recently called for a Blogger's Code of Conduct, complete with badges and all, in the wake of the Kathy Sierra firestorm, tells Wired he has changed his mind (interesting article, worth reading in full):
I've come to think the call for a code of conduct was a bit misguided. A lot of sites have their own terms of service that are a lot like what I proposed for the code of conduct. And I was just saying, let's get the best of the breed, let's figure it out, so somebody who wants to have one of these doesn't have to think it all up for themselves. People have interpreted that as a call for some kind of MPAA ratings system or something. That's not at all what I was proposing. I was proposing a modular set of terms of service, so somebody could say, "I don't want this kind of behavior." Now, a lot of people already do that, so it's really much ado about nothing.
The risks of NOT engaging
Meanwhile, journalists at both The New York Times (NYT), and the normally blog-savy Guardian, used O'Reilly's proposal as a hook for attacking the nasty world of blogs. In a rather ill-informed piece for The Guardian's Comment is Free, Jonathan Freedland claimed "The blogosphere risks putting off everyone but point-scoring males." I often wonder if journalists who write articles like this and the NYT piece ever read blogs, and if so, which blogs: yes there are some trolls around, but they are rare exceptions, not the rule (for the UK, maybe they only read Guido, who does attract an unusual high number of trolls in the comment section).
These ignorant attacks on the blogosphere only serve to strengthen the perception of MSM as Big Bad Media that has shut itself off from the community it is supposed to serve. Luckily, there are some excellent commentators out there, like this one on Freedland's piece, who can put the house right:
"Must have been so nice to be a journalist or commentator in the old days. Just lock what you say in print and damn the masses. Times have changed. You can lock the doors, but then there’ll just be you." (via Guardian's blogs editor Kevin Anderson, who called it the best comment ever and said: "Certainly there are risks to opening up and engaging, but this comment succinctly highlights the risks of doing nothing.)
The conflicts between journalism and blogging
Interestingly, Martin Stabe, normally a top-notch blogger, wrote a piece about the 'code-of-conduct-debate' that was so journalistic that BBC Today invited him to defend the code, which he was actually against, on air. Must have been a weak moment where his journalistic training got the better of the blogger in him, can't say it hasn't happened to me.
They didn't exactly invite me to come on to defend it. They asked me to be available if they couldn't find anyone more clearly in favour. But then they seem to have axed the item altogether.
You raise an interesting point though. I'm far more careful about what I write when I write for Press Gazette (even on its blogs) than I am on my own blog -- and it doesn't necessarily make for better blog posts.
Posted by: Martin | April 14, 2007 at 07:49 PM
Well, I have thought about this 'conflict' a lot, and I see journalism students and people fresh out of journalism school often comment on how the opinionated blog format seem to clash with the values of objective reporting instilled in them in journo school.
Personally, I spent many years working as a columnist/political commentator before I went to City, and for several years after I graduated everything I wrote seemed to come out as news. Blogging changed that / enabled me to recapture my personal voice to some extent, but voice fluctuates and I still find myself reverting to more news-style reporting on my blog, when, for instance, I have too much on my plate.
In the early blogging days, 'ass-covering and offense-avoiding' were attributes of 'the old world', certainly didn't belong on a blog, but I catch myself reverting to that even here, in my personal space, every now and again, or at least feel the urge to do so.
On the other hand, I think the more (and longer) you work in a particular format, like a blog, personal or not, the more comfortable you become with it – over time you gain a better understanding of what your audience is comfortable with, the right tone etc – I think I've seen that even with newspaper blogs: they get more 'personal' and distinct as time goes by and the blogger-journalists get more comfortable with the format and dare to show more of themselves even if it is a 'public' blog.
Posted by: Kristine | April 16, 2007 at 08:51 AM