How bloggers beat the big broadcasters to UK Election News
May 07, 2007
A follow-up post from Mike Rouse on my post about UK bloggers vs broadcasters:
As one of those trawling the blogs I can assure you that we were indeed ahead because of the priceless information posted on blogs very quickly. Some bloggers had contacts within counts, others posted from mobile devices while it seems others used their crystal balls. Either way, it meant we got the news quickly. I was using feed readers and live bookmarks to keep up-to-date and made use of the Firefox extension that automatically refreshes pages for you (full post here).
As BBC Parliament is showing the entire 1997 election night, when Blair came to power, today, Mike also recounts his whereabouts on that particular night: "Without trying to make any dear readers feel old, I was but 13 turning 14 when Blair came to power in 1997."
Nah, that just makes me feel ancient. I was some eight months past 19 (going-on-90) on that night, when I found myself in a Scottish-Independence-supporter stronghold in Queensferry with Scottish sci-fi writers, Ken MacLeod, Ian Banks, a poet, whose name I can't remember, and my friend Solan (whom, like me, I suspect wasn't too impressed with either political alternative).
What I remember best from that night was fighting a desperate battle to stay awake, since some drunken football hooligans had kept me awake on the night coach from Brighton to Edinburgh (!) the previous night (what I wouldn't suffer for brilliant conversations and company in those days, even eleven hours on a coach – it was worth it though). So when they announced that mudslide victory for Labour I was just delighted by the prospect of finally getting some sleep...
The one thing this local election made clear to me was just how powerless print media is in this situation, for one reason or another I wasn't exposed to any media until about 10.30am the morning after the election. I grabbed the daily papers that were at the conference venue I was at, but not one one of them could tell me how the election results had gone. I hopped online, and could get full results, analysis and the beginnings of the discussion.
Posted by: Adam | May 08, 2007 at 02:34 PM
I know. I'm reminded of this every time I'm faced with writing an op-ed for a print only publication: by the time it gets into print the debate online has moved on and it's ancient news. When you spend a lot of time (working) in an online environment I think your expectations change: you want your news instantly, and the informal/conversational style of online discussion means, at least for me, the weeklong disputes btwn print-based commentators seem increasingly staged and stilted.
Posted by: Kristine | May 09, 2007 at 11:42 AM
Interesting.
I ran a couple of services that met different levels of success.
A mini news-aggregator for election blogs in my blog sidebar was used a lot - aimed at saving people time trawling around.
A chatroom - aimed at instant updates and comments - was hardly used at all. When it was used it was important and helped bloggers break the "spoilt papers" story on the BBC programme.
I think the point is that on Election night we are at extremes - half of the night we are even more time-poor than usual, the other half we are bored to tears waiting.
Matt
Posted by: Matt Wardman | May 09, 2007 at 05:15 PM